OPS400 Lab Simulation / 4-5 page APA essay and Appendix

Once selected as a tutor I will give detailed instructions as to how to access the lab. Recommended
Yadavalli, V. S., & Balcou, C. (2017). A supply chain management model to optimise the sorting capability
of a ‘third party logistics’ distribution centre. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(1),
77-84. Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/61749/Yadavalli_Supply_2017.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=yIvanov, D., Mason, S. J., & Hartl, R. (2016). Supply chain dynamics, control and disruption management. International Journal of
Production Research, 54(1), 1-7. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1114186 Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., & Talluri, S. (2015). Supply chain risk management: a literature review. International Journal of Production
Research, 53(16), 5031-5069. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1030467
Additional Resources
American Supplier Institute (ASI)Council of Supply Chain Management ProfessionalsInstitute for Supply ManagementOperations
Management textbook companion website for the 11th and 12th editions

References
Heizer, J. Render, B., & Munson, C. (2017). Operations management: Sustainability and
supply chain management (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)Important! Read FirstChoose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do
not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title
of your submission.Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain ManagementAccess the Pearson MyOMLab per the instructions located in the
Course Information folder, titled: MyOMLab Student Guide. Carefully
review the simulation’s introductory information and instructions, as
these results will influence your grade by 10%.After completing
the simulation, capture a screen image of your final simulation results,
which are to be included in your critical thinking operations
management assignment as an appendix item.The operations supply chain management assignment content must include the following:
Introduction: Explain the purpose or thesis of the
paper and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support the
purpose of the paper.Provide a brief definition of supply chain management and identify why it is important in an organization’s operations.Provide a brief overview description of the supply chain management simulation.Describe your strategy for performing the supply chain management simulation.Describe at least three operations supply chain management methods,
principles, or techniques experienced in the supply chain management
simulation.Itemize at least three lessons learned from the supply chain management simulation.
Conclusion: Present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.
References: Include at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text.
Appendix: Supply chain management simulation results.
The appendix page should be its own page after your reference page, with
the header: Appendix—with your screenshot below.Submit your Critical Thinking assignment document(s) to the module
submissions area established for this purpose. Per the assignment
rubric, a portion of your evaluation is based on your simulation
results.Option #1: Operations Supply Chain Management Paper
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.Writing an operations supply chain management paper.Your paper will require a structure that includes a strong title,
followed by an introductory paragraph which generates interest and
includes a thesis and mapping of what is to come.Each of the sections should use appropriate APA headings, including a conclusion section.Make sure that the body sections address each of the previous bullets.Submission Requirements:Your well-written paper should be four to six pages in length, not including the required cover and references pages.Support your paper with at least four to six scholarly references
(excluding all textbooks). Use current sources, not older than five
years. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.Format your paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.Option #2: Operations Supply Chain Management Presentation
This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Supply Chain Management Simulation.Creating a multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation.Your multimedia-rich operations supply chain management presentation
must contain logically cohesive flow including audio, video, and
graphical content.The length of the presentation, in addition to the title and
reference portions, should be 10-12 slides (must include speaker notes),
or five to seven minutes of narrated presentation (must include a
transcript).Please present your content clearly, concisely, and cohesively.The presentation may be submitted as a completely self-contained
file (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, Screencast-o-matic, Knovio, or Loom) or
as a link to a hosted internet site.Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for Options #1 and #2: Operations Supply Chain Management section above.Rubric

OPS400 Mod 7 CT

OPS400 Mod 7 CT

Criteria
Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Requirements

10.0
to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0
to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0
to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Content

20.0
to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0
to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0
to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Critical Analysis

20.0
to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

16.0
to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0
to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Operations Supply Chain Management Simulation Performance

20.0
to >16.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,002,000.

16.0
to >12.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,008,000 and above $1,002,000.

12.0
to >8.0 pts

Below Expectation
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost at or below $1,012,000 and above $1,008,000.

8.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Performed the entire simulation delivering 25,000 gizmos with the cost above $1,012,000.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Sources / Examples

15.0
to >12.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Sources
or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide
substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

12.0
to >9.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Sources
or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen
to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

9.0
to >6.0 pts

Below Expectation
Sources
or examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to provide
substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0
to >8.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Project
is clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format as
outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few
errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0
to >6.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Project
is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format as
outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph
structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0
to >4.0 pts

Below Expectation
Project
is poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistent
to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in
grammar and spelling.

4.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Project
is not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format.
Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome

Demonstrates proper use of APA style.

5.0
to >4.0 pts

Meets Expectation
Project
contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0
to >3.0 pts

Approaches Expectation
Few
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0
to >2.0 pts

Below Expectation
Significant
errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing
and APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0
to >0 pts

Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points:
100.0

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Order

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp
%d bloggers like this: