report evaluating the leadership of a 21st century
[ad_1]
Leadership
Final Project Instructions
Professor: Dr. Kashif Mehmood
Write a report evaluating the leadership of a 21st century leader of an (business, government or notfor-profit) organization.
For this assignment you can select a leader from a large or a small organization. You can select a
leader from your own organization or one that you are familiar with. It could be a CEO of an
international organization whom you have read about in the newspapers/biographies, or a family
member who runs a small business with a few staff members. The choice of leader and organization
is yours.
Using relevant theories and models, critically evaluate and analyze the leadership of the leader you
have selected. If you were in the position of the leader, what could you do to be a better leader and
make a stronger impact on the followers and on the situation?
In your report you must cover the following:
• A clear description of the leader, the organization/industry, and situation/context.
• An evaluation of the leader by referring to concepts and theories covered in the subject (e.g. style,
behavior, traits, attitudes, power) and by referring to relevant examples and mini-cases in the
textbook (where appropriate).
• A discussion of how you would lead differently if you were put in the same situation(s) as the
leader and how you could make a stronger impact on the followers and on the situation(s).
It is important to demonstrate your knowledge about leadership and to clearly reference your
sources. Read about leadership in journal articles (using EBSCO Host Online Library), books
(including the textbook), and business literature, etc. Note the sources and use them throughout
the report.
Remember that pure description and paraphrasing is not sufficient. A good report will clearly take
an analytical approach and demonstrate application of leadership concepts/theories.
In order to do well you need to structure your discussion well, use good references, and clearly link
recommendations to description and analysis presented earlier in the report.
IQRA UNIVERSITY Page 2
Leadership
Marking Rubric for Final Project
Professor: Dr. Kashif Mehmood
| Key Components | A Grade 88 % – 100 % |
B+ Grade81 % – 87 % |
B Grade 74 % – 81 % |
C+ Grade 67 % – 74 % |
C Grade60%- 66% |
F Grade Fail <60% |
Weight |
| Understanding of course content that is used as the basis for reflection |
The student has demonstrated a broad conceptual understanding of the concepts of leadership and has used the concepts as the basis of the reflection. |
The student has demonstrated a good conceptual understanding of the concepts of leadership and has used the concepts as the basis of the reflection. |
The student has demonstrated the ability to describe the main elements of the concepts of leadership and has also attempted use the concepts as the basis of the reflection. |
The student has demonstrated a basic understanding of the concepts of leadership. The student has made some attempt to use the subject concepts as the basis of the reflection. |
The student has just barely fulfilled the minimum requirements of using course concepts in the assignment as the basis of the reflection. |
The student has demonstrated no understanding of the concepts of leadership. The student has made no attempt to use the concepts as the basis of the reflection. |
20 |
| Extent to which entry contains reflective writing |
All entries provided by the student consist of predominantly reflective writing. |
All entries provided by the student consist of reflective elements. |
All entries provided by the student consist of some reflective writing. |
The entries are mainly descriptive and have very little reflection. |
The entries barely fulfil the minimum requirements for reflective writing. |
The entries do not have any elements of reflective writing. |
20 |
| Depth of reflection and extent to which reflection is directed towards a purpose |
The entries provided by the student consistently apply an in depth critical reflection. The reflection has a clear outcome and is directed towards a purpose. |
The entries provided by the student are more of a dialogic reflection than an in depth critical reflection. The reflections are stepping back from events, taking stock and are directed towards a purpose. |
The entries provided by the student are primarily a descriptive reflection. The entries are descriptive in nature and lack depth, though there may be descriptive elements. |
The entries provided by the student are primarily descriptive and lack depth. The student is attempting to direct towards a purpose but by only conveying information. |
The entries provided barely fulfil the minimum requirements for depth of reflection and the extent to which the reflection is directed towards a purpose. |
The entries provided lack a depth of reflection and are not directed towards a purpose. |
20 |
| Extent to which | The entries have | The entries have | The entries have | The entries have | The reflective | The reflective | 10 |
IQRA UNIVERSITY Page 3
| personal experience is incorporated in responses |
personal experience incorporated which reflect and review personal change. |
personal experience incorporated and the personal values influence the reflection. |
personal experience incorporated which describes the personal values of the student. |
personal experience incorporated which only describes personal events. |
entries barely fulfil the minimum requirements of incorporating personal experience. |
entries have no personal experience incorporated. |
|
| Referencing | The student has adhered to Author date referencing conventions. The student has used appropriate number of quality references. The student has acknowledged sources of facts correctly. |
The student has adhered to Author date referencing conventions. The student has used appropriate number of references. The student has acknowledged sources of facts appropriately. |
The student has adhered to Author date referencing conventions with minor errors. The student has used appropriate number of references. The student has acknowledged sources of facts, but not in all cases. |
The student has adhered to Author date referencing conventions with major errors. The student has used appropriate number of references but they lack academic quality. The student has acknowledged sources of facts, but not in all cases. |
The student has not adhered to Author date referencing conventions. The student has not used appropriate number of quality references. The student has not acknowledged sources of facts appropriately. |
The student has not adhered to Author date referencing conventions. The student has not used any references. The student has not used any in text citations. |
10 |
| Communication and presentation style |
Highly developed communication and presentation skills |
Well-developed communication and presentation skills |
Good communication and presentation skills. |
The assignment was presented with a basic structure and presentation. The referencing style had no major issues. The communication skills were adequate. |
The assignment did not conform to the AIB Style guide for presentation, referencing, communication, style and language. |
The assignment was not of a professional standard. The requirements laid out in the AIB style guide were not followed. |
20 |
| Total | 100 |
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
