[ad_1]
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 1 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT BRIEF
| COURSE: Bachelor of IT | |
| Unit: | Cloud and Beyond |
| Unit Code: | CLBE304 |
| Type of Assessment: | Assessment 2 (Group Assignment) |
| Length/Duration: | N.A. |
| Course Learning Outcomes addressed: |
Information strategy, Business strategy and planning and Technical strategy and planning a) To gather, critically analyse, manage and present in meaningful ways information and data, and b) To devise risk assessments when solving complex problems in local and global business environments. Service design, Service transition and Service operation a) To monitor, research and interpret the fast changing and global world of information technology in terms of hardware, networks, software, and tools Communication skills a) To prepare design and system documentation and written reports b) To elicit requirements from clients, discuss intermediate solutions and present oral reports as individuals and in teams Teamwork and self-management skills a) To work collaboratively in small teams on a variety of large and small projects to produce models, software, documentation and reports b) To take responsibility for their own time management delivering quality required material on time in dynamically changing technological and communication contexts whether as an individual or member of a small team |
| Unit Learning Outcomes addressed: |
Upon successful completion of this unit students should be able to: a. Understand the common terms and definitions of cloud computing models, architectures and technologies b. Critically analyse the technical capabilities and business benefits of virtualisation and cloud computing c. Evaluate various service delivery models of cloud computing architecture, and the ways in which clouds can be deployed as public, private, hybrid, and community clouds |
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 2 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
| d. Discuss the governance and security challenges that cloud deployments experience, and how these are addressed e. Evaluate a set of business requirements to determine suitability for a cloud computing model |
|
| Submission Date: | Week 11 |
| Assessment Task: | A written assignment undertaken in groups of three or four students acting as consultants to an enterprise considering implementing a cloud solution in a global environment. The report will be expected to address the requirements of the enterprise, evaluate possible solutions, discuss ethical, governance, maintenance and security issues and make recommendations for an appropriate cloud implementation. Reflecting the nature of the IT industry, students will be placed into multicultural teams. Students will be assessed as a team but also individually using a tool such as SPARKPLUS |
| Total Mark: | 50 marks |
| Weighting: | 50% of the unit total marks |
| Students are advised that any submissions past the due date without an approved extension or without approved extenuating circumstances incurs a 5% penalty per calendar day, calculated from the total mark E.g. a task marked out of 40 will incur a 2 mark penalty per calendar day. More information, please refer to (Documents > Student Policies and Forms > POLICY – Assessment Policy & Procedures – Login Required) |
ASSESSMENT DESCRIPTION:
The group report should be up to 5000 words. The word count should exclude Executive Summary, Table of
Contents and Appendix.
The structure of the submitted report would be:
• Title Page
• Executive Summary
• Table of Contents/List of Figures
• Introduction
• Business Process Explanation/Application
• Cloud Deployment Requirement
• Cloud Computing Solutions and Justifications
• Cloud Computing Solution Issues
o Ethical
o Governance
o Maintenance
o Security
• Implementation of the Proposed Cloud Computing Solution
• Conclusion
• Appendix
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 3 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION:
The assignment must be submitted online in Moodle. All materials MUST be submitted electronically in Microsoft
Word format. Other formats (e.g., pdf or MAC file) may not be readable by markers.
Please be aware that any assessments submitted in other formats will be considered LATE and will lose marks
until it is presented in MS Word. No paper based or hardcopy submission will be accepted
MARKING GUIDE (RUBRIC):
| Marking Criteria | Lecturer Expectation |
Marks | Comments |
| Introduction | 2 | ||
| Business Process /Application | 5 | ||
| Cloud Deployment Requirements | 5 | ||
| Cloud Computing Solutions and Justifications | 15 | ||
| Ethical, Governance, Maintenance and Security Issues of the Solution |
10 | ||
| Implementations of Proposed Cloud Computing Solutions | 10 | ||
| Conclusion | 3 |
GENERAL NOTES FOR ASSESSMENT TASKS
Content for Assessment Task papers should incorporate a formal introduction, main points and conclusion.
Appropriate academic writing and referencing are inevitable academic skills that you must develop and
demonstrate in work being presented for assessment. The content of high quality work presented by a student
must be fully referenced within-text citations and a Reference List at the end. Kent strongly recommends you
refer to the Academic Learning Support Workshop materials available on the Kent Learning Management System
(Moodle). For details please click the link http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
and download the file titled “Harvard Referencing Workbook”. This Moodle Site is the location for Workbooks
and information that are presented to Kent Students in the ALS Workshops conducted at the beginning of each
Trimester.
Kent recommends a minimum of FIVE (5) references in work being presented for assessment. Unless otherwise
specifically instructed by your Lecturer or as detailed in the Unit Outline for the specific Assessment Task, any
paper with less than five (5) references may be deemed not meeting a satisfactory standard and possibly be failed.
Content in Assessment tasks that includes sources that are not properly referenced according to the “Harvard
Referencing Workbook” will be penalised.
Marks will be deducted for failure to adhere to the word count if this is specifically stated for the Assessment Task
in the Unit Outline. As a general rule there is an allowable discretionary variance to the word count in that it is
generally accepted that a student may go over or under by 10% than the stated length.
GENERAL NOTES FOR REFERENCING
Kent Institute Australia Pty. Ltd.
Assessment Brief ABN 49 003 577 302 CRICOS Code: 00161E RTO Code: 90458
Version 2: 11th October, 2019 Page 4 of 4 TEQSA Provider Number: PRV12051
References are assessed for their quality. Students should draw on quality academic sources, such as books,
chapters from edited books, journals etc. The textbook for the Unit of study can be used as a reference, but not
the Lecturer Notes. The Assessor will want to see evidence that a student is capable of conducting their own
research. Also, in order to help Assessors determine a student’s understanding of the work they cite, all in-text
references (not just direct quotes) must include the specific page number(s) if shown in the original. Before
preparing your Assessment Task or own contribution, please review this ‘YouTube’ video (Avoiding Plagiarism
through Referencing) by clicking on the following link: link:
http://moodle.kent.edu.au/kentmoodle/mod/folder/view.php?id=3606
A search for peer-reviewed journal articles may also assist students. These type of journal articles can be located
in the online journal databases and can be accessed from the Kent Library homepage. Wikipedia, online
dictionaries and online encyclopaedias are acceptable as a starting point to gain knowledge about a topic, but
should not be over-used – these should constitute no more than 10% of your total list of references/sources.
Additional information and literature can be used where these are produced by legitimate sources, such as
government departments, research institutes such as the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC),
or international organisations such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). Legitimate organisations and
government departments produce peer reviewed reports and articles and are therefore very useful and mostly
very current. The content of the following link explains why it is not acceptable to use non-peer reviewed websites
(Why can’t I just Google?): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N39mnu1Pkgw
(thank you to La Trobe University for access to this video).
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
