Scanlon theory of freedom of expression review
[ad_1]
Scanlon theory of freedom of expression review
Why is Scanlon’s theory of freedom of expression wrong?
The Millean Principle – bottom page 844
- What kinds of act should NOT be restricted
- We need to have many types of principle for freedom that helps us grow
- Speech and action
Scanlon
-
- Recognize the difference between freedom of expression
- Legal right and morally right
- Morality ( some act are more morally right and morally wrong)
- Some things might be legally right but that doesn’t mean its morally right
- Law and legislation
- PAGE 839 – bottom half of the page
- Any type pf speech should be allowed ALTHOUGH any type pf speech should be restricted
- Any type of acts could hurt someone so it should be restricted but any type of speech that any hurt someone can be allowed
- What should be allowed and what shouldn’t be allowed should be categorized in freedom of expression with freedom of speech and freedom of acts
- PAGE 840 – 10 lines down
-
-
- He now argues that NOT all speech should be allowed and there should be some sort of restriction
- He tries to make these restriction every general
- PAGE 840 – Legal restriction
- In some cases act of restriction might result in harm although they are still immune from legal restriction
- You can’t justify legal restriction just because it may not cause harm
-
- Six example: 841-843
-
- These examples are great prove what kinds of acts of expression should be restricted
- His principle can accommodate to his principle
- Some act of expression could bring direct harm to someone
-
-
- You voice can wake the sleeping or trigger the avalanche…
-
- You can express yourself doesn’t matter in what type of way the expression is
-
- Assault and related act can be
- Bomb scare to get political attention
- Assault and related act can be
- Innocent until proven guilty
- Shouting fire in the theatre and causing panic
- I didn’t do anything but I contributed towards you harming someone towards because of me ordering you to do something
- Act of expression that brings drastic decrease upon personal safety
- Nerve gas would decrease personal safety but so you something such as political propaganda BUT you can restrict nerve gas although you cannot restrict political propaganda
- PAGE 844 – Millean principle
-
-
- You should be allowed to express yourself whether it causes harm to someone else or not
- Your acts of expression led someone else to cause harm to someone, although legally you acts of expression should not be restricted
-
- PAGE 845 – I hope it is…
-
- The Millan principle isn’t just a legal principle but also a moral principle
- He thinks if you don’t adapt a Millean principle than you can never have a legit government
- A legit government does not manipulate its population or control them
- You can’t govern a legit government if people can’t think for themselves
- PAGE 848-849, 854-856
Scanlon theory of freedom of expression review
Need Help with a similar Assignment?
The post Scanlon theory of freedom of expression review appeared first on homeworkcrew.
[ad_2]
Source link