Reasons Why The Soviet Union Collapsed In 1989
[ad_1]
Answer 8 of 12 Questions below. Be sure to write at least 3-4 sentences. (10 points each—note that two answers will count as extra credit.
- Why do Historians often consider the Second World War in EUROPE two DIFFERENT wars?
- Evaluate two differences and two similarities between Italian Fascism and National Socialism.
- How were Japanese and Brazilian attempts to regulate the economy in the 1920s and 1930s similar?
- How does the formation of International Organizations after the Second World War relate to global political shifts?
- Evaluate some of the consequences of Mass Society in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
- Explain the concept of Total War and some of its consequences for the First World War.
- What was Woodrow Wilson’s promise of “Nationalistic Self-Determination?” How does this relate to tensions experience in the 1920s?
- Explain how peasants tended to view Maoist policies in the late 1940s and 1950s according to the documentary viewed for class.
- Explain three reasons why the Soviet Union collapsed in 1989.
- Why do historians consider the Russian Revolution two separate Revolutions?
- Explain why Maoism is more successful at attracting global support than other forms of Marxism
- Explain the relationship between Western/European Decolonization and the Vietnam War
PART II: Answer the following two long answer questions in at least 8 sentences. Be as precise and specific in your answer as possible (20 points each)
- Consider the following SECONDARY SOURCE. Describe the author’s main argument, and explain how it fits into the main historiographical interpretations of the Cold War (i.e. Orthodox, Revisionist and Post-revisionist):
Now, if the Soviet Union had occupied, let us say, the position of Uruguay in the post-World War II international system, this kind of autocracy certainly would have oppressed its citizenry, but it would not have caused a Cold War. If the Soviet Union had been the superpower that it actually was, but with a system of checks and balances that could have constrained Stalin’s authoritarian tendencies, a Cold War might have happened, but it could hardly have been as dangerous or as protracted a conflict. If the Soviet Union had been a superpower and an authoritarian state, but if someone other than Stalin had been running it? A Bukharin, for example, or perhaps even a Trotsky? Then its government would have been in the hands of a Kremlin leader who, although by no means a democrat, at least would have known the outside world, and might have found it easier than Stalin did to deal with it on a basis of wary cooperation instead of absolute distrust. Unfortunately, none of these counterfactuals became fact. Stalin was in command, and the people of the Soviet Union, together with the rest of the world, were stuck with him at the end of World War II. That was a tragedy, if not in a classical sense, then in an all too modern one…
- Explain the differences and similarities between classical Marxism, Leninism and Maoism.
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US:
11+ years experience on custom writing
90% Return Client
Urgent 3 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions
Money Back Guarantee
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
