MBA641 Strategic Project Management
[ad_1]
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIACopyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment 2 Information
| Subject Code: | MBA641 |
| Subject Name: | Strategic Project Management |
| Assessment Title: | Statement of Work (SOW) |
| Assessment Type: Length: |
Individual Written Analysis 2000 words (+/- 10% allowable range) |
| Weighting: | 30% |
| Total Marks: Submission: |
100 Online |
| Due Date: | Week 8 |
Your task
You are required to prepare a Statement of Work (SOW) based on your tender for the contract to build
the new Sydney Cruise Terminal that you have prepared in the first assessment.
Assessment Description
The purpose of this assessment is to foster students’ ability to evaluate and determine project viability,
including the analysis required in the selection process. Students will also demonstrate the criteria
required to evaluate the success of projects based on an organisation’s goals, strategy and standards.
Assessment Instructions
Presume that your project tender from Assessment 1 was accepted by stakeholders. Based on this, you
are now required to prepare a Statement of Work (SOW) based on the information contained in the case
study and the details you presented in Assessment 1. As the Sydney Cruise Terminal is a real-life case
study, you are expected to compliment your work with additional research on the project and site.
Your Statement of Work must contain all the required elements as covered in the course, including an
introduction, scope, location, main tasks, milestones, deliverables, schedule, standards, success
criteria, requirements, budget outlines, any other relevant information and a closing statement. These
elements must follow the information contained in the case study and be strictly linked to the proposal
you presented in Assessment 1.
While this is a written analysis, you can include any tables, analysis or diagrammatical elements you
deem appropriate. You will be required to include a minimum of 15 references in your Statement of
Work at least 5 of which must come from academic journals or textbooks and use Kaplan Harvard
Referencing Style. Wikipedia and other ‘popular’ sites are not to be used.
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIACopyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Assessment Submission
This file must be submitted as a ‘Word’ document to avoid any technical issues that may occur from
incorrect file format upload. Uploaded files with a virus will not be considered as a legitimate submission.
Turnitin will notify you if there is an issue with the submitted file. In this case, you must contact your
lecturer via email and provide a brief description of the issue and a screenshot of the Turnitin error
message. You are also encouraged to submit your work well in advance of the deadline to avoid any
possible delay with the Turnitin similarity report or any other technical difficulties.
Late assignment submission penalties
Penalties will be imposed on late assignment submissions in accordance with Kaplan Business School
“late assignment submission penalties” Policy.
| Number of days |
Penalty |
| 1* – 9 days | 5% per day for each calendar day late deducted from the total marks available |
| 10 – 14 days | 50% deducted from the total marks available. |
| After 14 days | Assignments that are submitted more than 14 calendar days after the due date will not be accepted, and the student will receive a mark of zero for the assignment(s). |
| Note | Notwithstanding the above penalty rules, assignments will also be given a mark of zero if they are submitted after assignments have been returned to students |
*Assignments submitted at any stage within the first 24 hours after the deadline will be considered to be
one day late and therefore subject to the associated penalty
For more information, please read the full policy via https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Assessment Information
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIACopyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any
further reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School
Pty Ltd ABN 86 098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
Important Study Information
Academic Integrity Policy
KBS values academic integrity. All students must understand the meaning and consequences of
cheating, plagiarism and other academic offences under the Academic Integrity and Conduct Policy.
What is academic integrity and misconduct?
What are the penalties for academic misconduct?
What are the late penalties?
How can I appeal my grade?
Click here for answers to these questions:
https://www.kbs.edu.au/about-us/school-policies
Word Limits for Written Assessments
Submissions that exceed the word limit by more than 10% will cease to be marked from the point at
which that limit is exceeded.
Study Assistance
Students may seek study assistance from their local Academic Learning Advisor or refer to the
resources on the MyKBS Academic Success Centre page. Click here for this information.
COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969
This material has been reproduced and communicated to you by or on behalf of Kaplan Business School pursuant to Part VB of the Copyright Act 1968 (‘Act’). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further
reproduction or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Kaplan Business School is a part of Kaplan Inc., a leading global provider of educational services. Kaplan Business School Pty Ltd ABN 86
098 181 947 is a registered higher education provider CRICOS Provider Code 02426B.
MBA641 Assessment 2 Marking Rubric – Statement of Work (SOW) 30%
| Marking Criteria (__/100) |
F (Fail) 0-49% |
P (Pass) 50-64% |
C (Credit) 65-74% |
D (Distinction) 75 – 84% |
HD (High Distinction) 85-100% |
| SOW Overall __/10 marks |
You have written an SOW that is unclear and/or vague. It does not cover the significant elements of the case study. |
You have written a basic SOW that partially covers some of the significant elements of the case study. |
You have written an enhanced SOW that covers most of the significant elements of the case study. |
You have written a clear SOW that covers all of the significant elements of the case study. |
You have written a comprehensive SOW that covers all of the significant elements of the case study. |
| Project Overall __/10 marks |
You have proposed a project that is not clear, unstructured and/or relevant to the assessment task. |
You have proposed a basic project that is clear, although further detail and structure would improve its quality. |
You have proposed a project that is clear, although further detail and structure would enhance its quality. |
You have proposed a project that is detailed and structured. |
You have proposed a project that is comprehensive and well structured. |
| Alignment/Misalignment __10 marks |
Your SOW is not aligned to assessment 1. Findings lack depth, and/or your interpretation is not relevant to the assessment task. |
Your SOW is somewhat aligned to assessment 1, although further depth and interpretation would improve its quality. |
Your SOW is aligned to assessment 1, although further interpretation would enhance its quality. |
Your SOW is aligned to assessment 1, and your interpretation is clear. |
Your SOW is fully aligned to assessment 1, and your interpretation is clear and well structured. |
| SOW Content __/20 marks |
You did not identify and/or describe specific project task within each project phase – Work requirements not separated into project phases. Understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases not demonstrated. |
You have identified and described specific project tasks within each project phase – Demonstration of basic level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. |
You have identified and described specific project tasks within each project phase – Demonstration of adequate level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. |
You have identified and described specific project tasks within each project phase – Demonstration of a high-level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. |
You have comprehensively identified and described specific project tasks within each project phase – Demonstration of advanced-level understanding of project life cycle phases and chronology of specific project tasks within project phases. |
| Theory Application __/20 marks |
You have applied minimal or none of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts. |
You have applied some of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts. |
You have applied many of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts. |
You have applied most of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts. |
You have comprehensively applied all of the relevant MBA641 theories and concepts and did so convincingly. |
| Use of sources/supportive evidence __/10 marks |
Your research lacks focus and/or you have chosen unsuitable or bogus sources, which do not link to the required assessment task. |
You have demonstrated a basic level of research, which is supported by a reasonable selection of primary and/or secondary sources. |
You have demonstrated substantial research, which is supported by a reasonable selection of primary and secondary sources. |
You have demonstrated substantial research, which is supported by an appropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources. |
You have demonstrated extensive research, which is supported by an appropriate selection and range of primary and secondary sources. |
| In-text Citations and Referencing __/10 marks |
Neither in-text referencing and/or reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style. |
In-text referencing or the resultant reference list adheres to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors. |
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with some errors. |
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with only occasional minor errors. |
Both, in-text referencing and the resultant reference list adhere strictly to Kaplan Harvard Referencing Style, with no errors. |
| Grammar/Spelling __/10 marks |
Spelling and/or grammar is consistently incorrect. It impacts on the flow and readability of your analysis. |
Though there are some errors in grammar and spelling, these do not detract from the readability and flow of your analysis. |
Mostly correct grammar and spelling but any errors do not impact on the readability and flow of your analysis. |
Errors in grammar and spelling are rare, which enhances the readability and flow of your analysis. |
Perfect grammar and spelling throughout, which enhances the readability and flow of your analysis. |
| Feedback and grades will be released via MyKBS. |
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
