What should you do about continuing to do business with Marshall?



Review the Contracts Analysis Case Study prior to answering the questions listed below. Assignment: Write a legal analysis of at least 1,000 words that answers the following questions from both a legal and a spiritual perspective: 1. What should you do about continuing to do business with Marshall? 2. If you elect to stop doing business with Marshall, what legal causes of action might he bring against your company, what damages or remedies might he seek, and what legal defenses might your company have? 3. If you stop doing business with Marshall, what are the potential impacts on Marshall’s continued exploration of his faith? What biblical options are available for resolving your disputes with Marshall? Your analysis must be supported by at least 3 legal or scholarly sources, cited in proper APA format. The assignment must also be formatted in current APA format, but you do not need to include an abstract. In connection with this assignment, you may want to research the following legal concepts and incorporate what you find in your analysis if you consider them relevant: • Covenants of good faith and fair dealing; o See, e.g., Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc., 148 N.J. 396 (1997). • Minor’s capacity to contract; • Fraud in the execution of a contract; • An employee’s capacity to bind a company by contract; • Section 2-306 of the Uniform Commercial Code; • Implied contracts; • Promissory Estoppel; • Custom and practice between merchants; • Biblical dispute resolution; and • Any other legal concepts you believe may be relevant.Contracts Analysis Case StudyMarshall Petersen and his wife,Gloria,began visiting the Sunday school class you teach in Huntsville, Alabama, about six months ago. Marshall is not a Christian, but with the encouragement of his wife, who is a believer, he says he is beginning to explore the faith.After his first visit to the class, you spent some time talking with Marshall and you discovered that he owns a small, local health food products business, and that he is interested in growing the business by adding some new product lines. You informed him of the high antioxidant qualities of the Muscadine grapes your family’sproduce company sells,and you asked him if he might be interested in promoting either the grapes themselves or the various productsdeveloped using their seeds. Marshallwas interested, and a few days later you supplied him with some samples. The samples turned out to be a very popular item with his regular customers, so he placed a modest phone order with your company. Over time,Marshall placed regular, increasingphone orders, and he began investing heavily in advertising for the Muscadine products at his store. Your company has faithfully delivered everything requested, promptly, and at consistent prices. You typically sent an invoice with each delivery, requiring payment within 30 days, and though Marshall has frequently been late making payment, he has generally paid each invoice within 45 to 60 days. You have elected not to charge him any interest or penalties, though your invoices state that you reserve the right to do so.On one occasion when your son, a part-time deliveryman for your company, delivered some product to Marshall’s store, Marshall handed your son a requirements contract and asked him to sign it on behalf of your company. The contract includes a guaranteed price schedule consistent with what he had been paying. Marshall told him that it was “just a formality” to guarantee a continuing business relationship. Your son signed the contract and gave it back to Marshall. Neither Marshallnor your son mentioned the contract to you. Your son was 17 years old at the time, but turned 18 last month.After a columnist for The Huffington Post wrote an article praising the antioxidant qualities of Muscadines, the demand for Muscadines skyrocketed nationwide. Your company became inundated with orders, far in excess of your ability to meet the demand. A company in Texas offered to pay you twice the going rate for your products, but the company also required you to sign an output contract as a part of the deal.Though this contract would represent a substantial financial windfall for your company, you felt bad about potentially leaving Marshall out to dry. You calledMarshall, advised him of the offer you had received, and you suggested to him the names of other reputable potential suppliers in the area to try and soften the blow.To your surprise, Marshall became very angry and told you that he expectedyou to continue to supply him with all the product he needs, when he needs it, and at the prices he had always paid, per the requirements contract between your businesses and in accordance with an implied duty of good faith and fair dealing that had evolved based on your ongoing business relationship. When you asked what requirements contract he was talking about, he faxed you a copy of the contract that had been signed by your son.Contracts Analysis InstructionsReview the Contracts AnalysisCase Study prior to answering the questions listed below.Assignment:Write a legal analysis of at least 1,000 words that answers the following questions from both a legal and a spiritual perspective:What should you do about continuing to do business with Marshall?If you elect to stop doing business with Marshall, what legal causes of action might he bring against your company, what damages or remedies might he seek, and what legal defenses might your company have?If you stop doing business with Marshall, what are the potential impacts on Marshall’s continued exploration of his faith? What biblical options are available for resolving your disputes with Marshall?Your analysis must be supported by at least 3legal or scholarly sources, cited in proper APA format. The assignment must also be formatted in current APA format, but you do not need to include an abstract.In connection with this assignment, you may want to research the following legal concepts and incorporate what you find in your analysis if you consider them relevant:Covenants of good faith and fair dealing;See, e.g., Sons of Thunder, Inc. v. Borden, Inc., 148 N.J. 396 (1997).Minor’s capacity to contract;Fraud in the execution of a contract;An employee’s capacity to bind a company by contract;Section 2-306 of the Uniform Commercial Code;Implied contracts;Promissory Estoppel;Custom and practice between merchants;Biblical dispute resolution; andAny other legal concepts you believe may be relevant.Submit this assignmentviaSafeAssign by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 3 . WITH BEST NURSING TUTORS TODAY AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNTThe post What should you do about continuing to do business with Marshall? appeared first on BEST NURSING TUTORS . Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.  “Is this question part of your assignment? We Can Help!”

Thanks for installing the Bottom of every post plugin by Corey Salzano. Contact me if you need custom WordPress plugins or website design.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Our ENL Writers can help. Get your first order at 15% off!

Order

Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Chat with us on WhatsApp
%d bloggers like this: