Assessment 3: Project Report – Part B

Assessment 3: Project Report – Part B
Due date: Week 12
Group/individual: Group
Word count/Time provided: 2000 words
Weighting: 15%
Unit Learning Outcomes: ULO1, ULO3, ULO4, ULO5
Assessment 3 Detail
This assessment is a staged submissions assessment, and it should be conducted in two parts. The second part of assessment 2 should be conducted in continuation of Assessment 2(Part A).
Project Report – Part B Details :
At the end of assessment 2(Part A) students should have decided on the base scenario. In this assessment, students should continue the project development and optimise their case report by conducting a sensitive analysis, Identification stakeholders and their needs, understanding due diligence process. It is important that sustainability be considered during project development and optimisation process.
For sensitivity analyses, parameters should be selected, and scenarios of sensitivity analyses should be defined accordingly. For each scenario, the economic analysis should be carried out, and results should be compared and explained.
The students should also identify stakeholders, gather the information needed for stakeholders and supporters of the project by considering due diligence process.
As a project manager, your recommendations on the project are critical. In your report assessing of the project, the report should address brief on the importance of sustainability and how the stakeholders of this project to be engaged.
Guidelines for writing project report Part B:
1) Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.
2) Conduct a sensitivity analysis with respect to interest rate and economic analysis.
3) Identify Stakeholders and prepare a Stakeholder register.
4) Consider due diligence process and provide stakeholders engagement plan.
5) Consider project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability.
6) Conclusions, findings, reasons for recommendation.
Assessments 3 (Project Report – Part B) Marking Criteria and Rubric
The assessment will be marked out of 100 and will be weighted 15% of the total unit mark. The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.
Assessment 3 (Project Report – Part B) Marking Criteria and Rubric
Marking Criteria Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark) Satisfactory
(50-64% of the criterion mark) Good
(65-74% of the criterion mark) Very Good
(75-84% of the criterion mark) Excellent
(85-100% of the criterion mark)
Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis (15 marks) Inadequate Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.
Basic Identification and Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills for
Identification and
Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Exhibits accurate & detailed
breadth & depth
Identification and for Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis Displays Excellent
Identification and
Justifications of parameters used in the sensitivity analysis.
Conducting a sensitivity analysis and economic analysis (15 marks) Inadequate sensitivity analysis and economic
analysis
Basic sensitivity analysis and
economic analysis
Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills in sensitivity analysis and economic analysis Exhibits accurate & detailed breadth & depth in sensitivity analysis and economic analysis Displays Excellent sensitivity analysis and economic analysis.
Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan (20 marks) Inadequate Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Basic Identification of Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills in
Identification of
Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Exhibits accurate & detailed
breadth & depth in
Identification of
Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan Displays Excellent
Identification of
Stakeholders, considering due diligence process and providing stakeholders engagement plan
Considering project management and optimisation with focus on
sustainability (15 marks) Inadequate Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability.
Basic Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills in Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Exhibits accurate & detailed
breadth & depth in Considering project management and optimisation with focus on sustainability Displays Excellent Considering project
management and optimisation with focus on sustainability.
Conclusions and recommendations. (5 marks) Inadequate Conclusions and
recommendations
Displays Basic Conclusions and recommendations Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Conclusions and recommendations.
Exhibits accurate and Detailed breadth and depth in Conclusions and
recommendations
Displays Excellent Conclusions and recommendations
Writing and Presentation (20 marks)
– Evidence of good academic writing; – Free of any grammatical errors; using correct sentence structure; applying an extensive range of vocabulary; – Proper introduction and conclusion. Consistent formatting with suitable headings and sub-headings – Consistent use of labels, highlights, font weight and underline, Reference list
Referencing using HARVARD guidelines Inadequate Writing and
Presentation skills
Basic
Writing and Presentation skills
Exhibits a factual and/or conceptual skills of Writing
and Presentation skills
Exhibits accurate and Detailed breadth and depth in Writing and
Presentation skills
Displays Excellent Writing and Presentation skills