Cultural Rights or Human Rights: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation
[ad_1]
The essay is not only for summarizing the readings but more importantly for commenting on some aspect that you found interesting or thought-provoking. The ultimate goal is to discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks that are used to help explain various aspects of human sexuality.
The primary goal of critical reading is to understand the author’s argument, identify key assumptions, and evaluate the evidence and influences leading to that conclusion. Never assume a “passive†position when reading a text. The (3-4 page) essays will need to answer the following questions:
- What are the central issues being discussed concerning some aspect of human sexuality or inequality?
- What are the authorâ€
s theoretical arguments concerning topic? - Are you convinced by the arguments? If not, what is the nature of your reservations?
- Do the authors have a stated or unstated point of view?
- Are the author’s goals, viewpoints, or agendas revealed in the introduction or preface of the articles?
- What evidence do the authors provide to support the argument and is it persuasive?
- Do the authors take a moral or political stand? Is it made explicit or implicit in the way the issues are treated and examined?
- Does the author present convincing evidence to support his/her views?
- Are you convinced by the arguments? If not, what is the nature of your reservations?
- What competing explanations could be put forth? Would they be more valid? Why or why not? What additional data or insights will you add to the essay?
Kalev, Henriette Dahan. “Cultural rights or human rights: The case of female genital mutilation.” Sex roles 51.5-6 (2004): 339-348.
The post Cultural Rights or Human Rights: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation appeared first on homeworkcrew.
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
