When conducting research and determining the outcomes of clinical trials
When conducting research and determining the outcomes of clinical trials or experiments it is important to see if the results have any significance. When determining the clinical significance results are evaluated to see if they are meaningful or not for the stakeholders. In other words, the effects of the results must be great enough to make the costs, inconveniences, and potential harm worth the risk. In comparison statistical significance evaluates whether any differences, if any, that are observed are in fact real or just due to chance. In other words, is the result due to the testing or a result to a cause. Clinical significance is directly because of the course of treatment and had genuine effects, compared to statistical significance where the result may be due to chance (Armijo-Olivo, 2018). Clinical significance can be shown in my evidence-based process by proving that the changes being made, have a positive impact resulting in the expected changes. Then take the changes that occurred and show that the results will have impacts on the costs and revenue for the facility
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
