context of negligent misstatement in negligence cases
[ad_1]
Question:
Case Study for Group 1:
Explain the cases of Shaddock & Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council (No 1) [1981] HCA 59 and Mutual Life & Citizens’ Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt [1968] HCA 74 in the context of negligent misstatement in negligence cases.
Case Study for Group 2:
Explain the cases of Commercial Bank of Australia v Amadio [1983] HCA 14 and Louth v Diprose [1992] HCA 61 in the context of unconscionable conduct and the Australian Consumer Law in providing genuine consent to contractual obligations.
Case Study for Group 3:
Explain the cases of Central London Property Trust v High Trees House Ltd [1947] 1 KB 130 and Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher [1988] HCA 7 in the context of the need to provide consideration in simple contracts.
Case Study for Group 4:
Explain the cases of Olley v Marlborough Court Ltd [1949] 1 KB 532 and Balmain New Ferry Co Ltd v Robertson [1906] HCA 83 in the context of when notice of exclusion clauses needs to be provided in unsig.
The post context of negligent misstatement in negligence cases appeared first on Scholar Writers.
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
