ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3
[ad_1]
ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3
ITP489 – In-Memory DB & Analytics
Case #3 – Evaluating the Cognitive Analytics Frontier
Learning Objectives:
To appraise how machine learning, natural language processing, and cognitive analytic platforms can facilitate access to information in multidimensional datasets leading to the formulation of informed business decisions.
Description:
In the fall of 2014, Chad Kartchner, senior manager of marketing and product management at Honeywell Aerospace (HA), pondered how technology could transform the way aircraft were maintained. The sheer volume of parts and the time-sensitive nature of repairs in the aviation industry made it complicated to identify problems and address them quickly. It was up to Kartchner to identify options that could be used to update HA’s ground-based maintenance system.
ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3
Steps:
- Download the Evaluating the Cognitive Analytics Frontier case from Blackboard.
- Read the case and focus upon areas such as…
- the current dynamics and complexities of aircraft maintenance.
- the options Kartchner is currently considering.
- whether there is a catalyst pushing Kartchner to favor one option over another.
- whether the important questions to ask when considering a new technology to solve a critical business decision are being asked by Kartchner.
- Kartchner’s risk analysis of the options; identifying all the pros and cons for each option.
- Write a single page, double-spaced analysis of the case where…
- The first paragraph briefly explains the case.
- In the following paragraphs, explain the options Kartchner is considering at Honeywell. Evaluate the results of Kartchner’s risk analyses, in other words, explain the pros and cons of each option. Can you think of any other options that Kartchner has not consiered?
- In the final paragraph, if you were Chad Kartchner, which option would you recommend for Honeywell and why? This is the most important part of your analysis. Your recommendation should reflect the options you have already discussed in your paper. Clearly state your proposal and provide supporting facts as to why your recommendation should be followed. These facts don’t necessarily have to be stated in the case itself; you may include material learned from outside the class.
- When you finish your paper, return to Blackboard, Week 10, and click on the assignment link
- It is recommended that you close your document, exit Word, and use Firefox to upload your document to Blackboard.
- When you successfully upload your document, you will receive a receipt via email.
- You must submit your case analysis before class next week when we will discuss the case in class.
ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3
Consult the provided rubric for information on how your case analysis will be graded.
ITP489 – In-Memory DB & Analytics
Grading Rubric for Case Analysis
Need Help with this Assignment?
| CRITERIA | EXCELLENT (100%) | MEETS EXPECTATIONS (90%) | APPROACHES EXPECTATIONS (75%) | NEEDS IMPROVEMENT (20%) |
| Completeness (25%) | Clearly and completely answers the assignment prompt (1. Briefly describes the case, 2) Lists some of the issues in the case, 3 Includes a recom-mendation and argument for an issue).
Adheres to required length. |
Almost completely answers the assignment prompt (one of the three parts is missing).
Adheres to required length. |
Partially addresses the assignment prompt (two of the three parts are missing.)
Adheres to required length. |
Does not address the assignment prompt. |
| Analysis (25%) | Rich, detailed description of the challenges or issues of concern mentioned in the case.
Well written; no spelling nor grammatical errors. |
Full description of the challenges or issues of concern mentioned in the case.
Contains some spelling and/or grammatical errors. |
Identifies only one challenge or issue of concern mentioned in the case. | No description of the any challenges or issues of concern mentioned in the case. |
| Recommendation (25%) | Clearly and strongly proposes a recommendation to an issue stated in the student’s analysis.
Well written; no spelling nor grammatical errors. |
Proposes a recommendation to an issue stated in the student’s analysis, however, there are spelling and/or grammatical errors. | The recommendation proposed does not address an issue stated in the student’s analysis or the recom-mendation is not realistic. | No recommendation is proposed. |
| Evidence (25%) | Clear attempt to integrate relevant facts, relationships, and the student’s self to support the recommendation proposed. | Clear attempt to integrate relevant facts, relationships, and the student’s self to support the recommendation proposed, however, there are spelling and/or grammatical errors. | Evidence provided does not support the recommendation made by the student. | No attempt to include evidence in support of recommendation. |
ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3
The post ITP489 In Memory DB & Analytics Case 3 appeared first on homeworkcrew.com.
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
