[ad_1]
KPB113 – Assessment 2 – Essay #2 – Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes Page 1 of 5
KPB113 Assessment 2 – Essay #2
Analysis of a Filmmaker or Actor & Key Scenes
Task overview
| Assessment name | Essay #2: Analysis of a Filmmaker or Actor & Key Scenes |
| Task description | |
| From the list below, choose one filmmaker or one actor, and a few (1-3) key scenes from their body of work. Analyse your chosen filmmaker or actor and these key scenes through ONE of the following analytical frames: • Auteur analysis OR • Star studies |
|
| Due Date | Friday 29 May 2020 (end of Wk 12) before 11:59 pm via Blackboard. |
| Length | • Word count range is 1700 to 1800 words, excluding References List & Title Page. • In-text citations and quotes are included in the word count. • Do not exceed the word count (10% leeway does not apply for this assignment). • Include the total word count on your essay’s Title Page. |
| Weighting | 60% |
| Individual or Group | Individual |
| Learning outcomes measured |
• Demonstrate a broad knowledge of film and television text forms, the industries that produce these texts and the audiences that consume them. • Apply textual analysis techniques to evaluate and theorise about the ways in which film and television texts communicate and construct meaning. • Use written language to effectively communicate interpretations of film and TV texts to an audience. |
Task Instructions
| What you need to do | 1. Select one (1) of the following analytical frames: • Auteur Analysis OR • Star Studies 2. [A] If you have selected AUTEUR ANALYSIS, choose a single filmmaker and a few (1-3) key scenes from their body of work: o Sofia Coppola o Paul Thomas Anderson o Jane Campion o Wes Anderson o David Lynch o Kathryn Bigelow o Spike Lee o Greta Gerwig |
KPB113 – Assessment 2 – Essay #2 – Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes Page 2 of 5
| 2. [B] If you have selected STAR STUDIES, choose a single actor and a few (1-3) key scenes from their body of work: o Timothée Chalamet o Nicole Kidman o Lupita Nyong’o o Sandra Oh o Dev Patel o Joaquin Phoenix o Brad Pitt o Kristen Stewart 3. Once you have chosen your framing and filmmaker / actor, use the following key question to guide your analysis: • AUTEUR ANALYSIS: What is the argument either for or against your chosen filmmaker being regarded as an auteur? • STAR STUDIES: How and why might the theory and categories of star studies apply to your chosen actors and their career? 4. Make sure your analysis considers the following elements (when relevant): • Production Context • Narrative and Narration • Mise-en-Scene • Cinematography • Editing • Sound • Genre codes, conventions and/or inventions • Motifs / symbolism • Visual style You do not need to address every textual element above. Select the ones which are most relevant to your framing and analysis. |
Submission Information
| What you need to submit |
What you need to submit: • Essay should be written in formal, academic style. Refer to guidelines in QUT write for more details. • Title page includes assessment title, the option(s) you have chosen, your name, student number, unit code, word count. • Essay should be formatted as follows: Times New Roman, 12 point font, 1.5 line spacing • Submit your essay as a Word document (not PDF or .pages) • You need to use APA referencing style. Ensure you are consistent. Include in-text citations and a corresponding reference list – refer to QUT cite|write for more details. • Check for plagiarism – use the Blackboard Submission (SafeAssign) tool. • Submit via Blackboard. |
KPB113 – Assessment 2 – Essay #2 – Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes Page 3 of 5
| Resources required to complete this assessment task • Guide to writing an analytical essay • QUT cite|APA guide • Turnitin Tipsheet • Blackboard Assignment Tipsheet • SafeAssign Tipsheet (to detect incorrect citation & plagiarism) Extension Requests: if you do need to request an extension save yourself valuable time. Do not contact your Unit Coordinator or your tutor directly. They cannot grant extension requests. You need to apply through HiQ. The link for this is the very first thing you see on the assessment tab on Blackboard and can also be found here. Please note: On submission, you are declaring that, unless otherwise acknowledged, this submission is wholly yours and/or the group’s work and it has not been used and already submitted. I/We understand that this work may be submitted for plagiarism check and consent to this taking place. |
|
| Moderation | All staff who are assessing your work meet to discuss and compare their judgements before marks or grades are finalised. Refer to MOPP C/5.1.7. |
| Academic Integrity As a student of the QUT academic community, you are asked to uphold the principles of academic integrity during your course of study. QUT sets expectations and responsibilities of students specifically stating that students “adopt an ethical approach to academic work and assessment in accordance with this policy and the Student Code of Conduct (E/2.1)”. Students need to be aware that academic integrity refers to text and non-text sources, i.e. “copying or adapting non-text based material created by others, such as diagrams, designs, musical score, audio visual materials, art work, plans, code or photographs without appropriate acknowledgement” (MOPP C/5.3.6 Academic Integrity). It also includes self-plagiarism, this “involves the re-use by a student of their own work without appropriate acknowledgement of the source. Students should seek express consent from the unit coordinator prior to re-using their own work in an assessment submission” (MOPP C/5.3.6 Academic Integrity). Students are expected to demonstrate their own understanding and thinking using ideas provided by ‘others’ to support and inform their work, always acknowledging the source. While we encourage peer learning, it is not appropriate to share assignments with other students unless your assessment piece has been stated as being a group assignment. If you do share your assignment with another student, and they copy all or part of your assignment for their submission, this is considered collusion and you may be reported for academic misconduct. If you are unsure and need more information http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/C/C_05_03.jsp#C_05_03.03.mdoc |
KPB113 – Assessment 2 – Essay #2 – Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes Page 4 of 5
KPB113 | Screen Text Analysis | Essay #2 | Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes | Rubric
The purpose of this qualitative rubric is purely for your feedback. The marker will decide on the grade/mark to put on the assessment.
| Criteria | + High Distinction – | + Distinction – | + Credit – | + Pass – | + Fail – | No Evidence |
| Knowledge, Understanding, and Application Weighting: 30 |
You have displayed a very comprehensive knowledge and under standing of your topic, very consistently and very accurately applying appropriate terms and concepts from this unit to support and develop your analysis. |
You have displayed a comprehensive knowledge and under standing of your topic, highly consistent and highly accurate application of appropriate terms and concepts from this unit to support and develop your analysis. |
You have displayed a reasonable degree of knowledge and under standing of your topic, demonstrating a reasonable level of consistency and accuracy in applying appropriate terms and concepts from this unit to support and develop your analysis. |
You have displayed a foundational degree of knowledge and under standing of your topic, demonstrating a foundational level of consistency and accuracy in applying appropriate terms and concepts from this unit to support and develop your analysis. |
You have displayed little knowledge and understanding of your topic, an inadequate level of consistency or accuracy in applying appropriate terms and concepts from this unit support and develop your analysis. . |
You have displayed no evidence of knowledge about and understanding of your topic — there is no evidence that you can apply appropriate terms and concepts from this unit to support and develop your analysis. |
| Textual Analysis Weighting: 30 |
You have critically analysed your film text(s) and auteur / actor in a very incisive and very sophisticated manner. Your analysis of relevant filmic language and style, or filmic techniques / star performance in relation to your chosen framework and topic is perceptive and creative. You have integrated highly appropriate filmic examples to support your persuasive, in-depth argument. |
You have critically analysed your film text(s) and auteur / actor in a highly incisive and sophisticated manner. Your analysis of relevant filmic language and style, or filmic techniques / star performance in relation to your chosen framework and topic is well developed and creative. You have integrated very appropriate filmic examples to support your in-depth argument. |
You have critically analysed your film text(s) and auteur / actor clearly. Your analysis of relevant filmic language and style, or filmic techniques / star performance in relation to your chosen framework and topic is considered and competent. You have integrated appropriate filmic examples to support your consistently developed argument. |
You have critically analysed your film text(s) and auteur / actor in an adequate manner. Your analysis of relevant filmic language and style, or filmic techniques / star performance in relation to your chosen framework and topic is general but sufficient. You have integrated mostly appropriate filmic examples to support your generally relevant argument. |
You have not critically analysed your film text(s) and auteur / actor in an adequate manner. Your analysis of relevant filmic language and style, or filmic techniques / star performance in relation to your chosen framework and topic is ineffective. You have failed to integrate appropriate filmic examples to support your largely weak and inaccurate argument |
You have provided no analysis of the filmic languages and style of your film text(s) and auteur / actor, or or have not considered filmic techniques. |
and failed to integrate
or use examples.
KPB113 – Assessment 2 – Essay #2 – Analysis of a Filmmaker & Key Scenes Page 5 of 5
| Research Weighting: 20 |
You have demonstrated an exemplary ability to undertake independent research and to evaluate and apply this research to develop and support your own ideas and argument, drawing upon academic and professional critical and/or screen industry sources. |
You have demonstrated a well-developed ability to undertake independent research and to evaluate and apply this research to develop and support your own ideas and argument, drawing upon academic and professional critical and/or screen industry sources. |
Essay demonstrates an ability to undertake independent research and to evaluate and apply this research to develop and support your own ideas and argument, drawing upon academic and professional critical and/or screen industry sources. |
Essay demonstrates a foundational ability to undertake basic research, drawing upon some professional critical and/or screen industry sources. |
Essay demonstrates an inadequate ability to undertake basic research, and draws upon unprofessional or dubious sources with major conceptual mistakes or errors in your interpretations. |
You have provided no evidence of independent research, or an ability to apply this knowledge to develop an argument. |
| Communication Weighting: 20 |
You have strongly and persuasively communicated your ideas, consistently and accurately using appropriate language and referencing conventions You have stayed within the stipulated word limit range (you did not go over this word limit). |
You have coherently and effectively communicated your ideas, consistently and accurately using appropriate language and referencing conventions. You have stayed within the stipulated word limit range (you did not go over this word limit). |
You have coherently and effectively communicated your ideas, consistently and accurately using appropriate language and referencing conventions. You have stayed within the stipulated word limit range (you did not go over this word limit). |
You have communicated satisfactorily your ideas, but there are some inaccuracies and/or inappropriateness in the use of language and referencing conventions. You have stayed, or mostly stayed, within the stipulated word limit range. |
You have communicated satisfactorily your ideas, but there are some inaccuracies and/or inappropriateness in the use of language and referencing conventions. Your discussion went significantly over or under the word limit range. |
You have not attempted to communicate any ideas. Your discussion of the text went well over or under the word limit range. |
*NE – No evidence provided.
Where + is high in the range and – is low in the range.
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
