MN503 Overview of Internetworking
[ad_1]
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
| Assessment Details and Submission Guidelines | |
| Unit Code | MN503 |
| Unit Title | Overview of Internetworking |
| Assessment Type | Group (3 students in a Group) |
| Assessment Title | Network requirement analysis and plan |
| Purpose of the assessment (with ULO Mapping) |
This assignment is designed to assess students’ knowledge and skills related to the following learning outcomes: d. Analyse and report on the current and future state of the internetworking infrastructure and its applications. e. Implement a process to support the administration and management of internetworking. |
| Weight | 30% of the total assessments |
| Total Marks | 70+30=100 |
| Word limit | 1500 -2000 (approximately 6-8 pages) |
| Due Date | 2nd, June 2020 Week 11 (Submit report on Moodle) Demonstration of the design and simulation model in week 11 during Lab. timings. |
| Submission Guidelines |
• All work must be submitted on Moodle by the due date along with a title Page. • The assignment must be in MS Word format, 1.5 spacing, 11-pt Calibri (Body) font and 2.54 cm margins on all four sides of your page with appropriate section headings. • Reference sources must be cited in the text of the report, and listed appropriately at the end in a reference list using IEEE referencing style. |
| Extension | • If an extension of time to submit work is required, a Special Consideration Application must be submitted directly to the School’s Administration Officer, in Melbourne on Level 6 or in Sydney on Level 7. You must submit this application three working days prior to the due date of the assignment. Further information is available at: http://www.mit.edu.au/about-us/governance/institute-rules policies-and-plans/policies-procedures-and-guidelines/assessment-policy |
| Academic Misconduct |
• Academic Misconduct is a serious offence. Depending on the seriousness of the case, penalties can vary from a written warning or zero marks to exclusion from the course or rescinding the degree. Students should make themselves familiar with the full policy and procedure available at: https://www.mit.edu.au/about mit/institute-publications/policies-procedures-and guidelines/AcademicIntegrityPolicyAndProcedure. For further information, please refer to the Academic Integrity Section in your Unit Description. |
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 2
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
Assignment Description
Project Scope: A typical network layout diagram of a higher education Institute is given as Figure-1 (for
illustrative purposes only). The Institute has sections segregated as Melbourne and Sydney campuses
connected through WAN. Within the campuses, we have laboratories and other office workstations
segregated into School of IT and School of Business.
The Network requirements are given as follows:
1. Two campuses have separate local area networks. Staff users from both campuses should be able to
have access from/to both campuses.
2. There should be a clear restriction that any host from library should not be allowed to ping hosts from
other offices.
3. Printing services should be available to all the schools’ users.
4. Wireless access is available to all the staff, student, and guest across both campuses.
5. Internet should be provided to all the sections (i.e. School of IT and School of business from both
campuses).
6. IP network design is required.
7. Hardware requirements with costs specification (specification of all the hardware required, number
of units and per unit cost).
8. Configuration details on the hardware (Routers, switches and workstations).
Assignment requirements: As a group, you are required to analyse the project requirement and then design
and simulate a network fulfilling the above mentioned requirement. You need to provide a fully functional
simulation model for the network. The report should have a detailed explanation of the planning and designing
of network. It is recommended that bullet points are included whenever necessary.
The sections that you need to consider in you report are as follows:
1. Project Scope
2. Project requirements
3. Network design – Consider the human factor design concepts
• This part should include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used.
4. IP addressing in a tabular form (include justification whenever necessary)
Figure-1: Network layout of the Higher Education Institute
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 3
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
5. Network topology diagram and simulation (CISCO Packet tracer is mandatory)
• Switch configuration
• Router configuration
• Access point and server configuration guidelines
• Security configuration
Student should show the demo of the network design in Week 11 lab. Work progress and consultation will be
done during week 9 and 10. Demonstration marks will be awarded in regards to the stage of the completion
of the design
The format of the demonstration will be
a) An individual demo,
b) At least 3 viva voce questions related to the design, and
c) Demo and viva voce duration 5 – 7 minutes (at max). The following is to be covered.
• Demonstration of the network design simulation in CISCO Packet Tracer.
Note to the lab tutor: As per the need, the lab tutor can allocate 15 minutes in Week 9 and Week 10 for
work progression check and consultation.
Marking criteria
The following marking criteria will be followed for the assignment report.
| Section to be included in the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
| Introduction | Introduction of the project and overview of the report |
05 |
| Project Scope | The project Scope should be explained in a logical approach |
05 |
| Project requirements | Identify the project’s functional and non-functional requirements |
10 |
| Network design | Explain the network design approach considering human factor (user-centric design) and also include LAN/WAN/WLAN details and protocols used. |
10 |
| Design Analysis | Provide an in-depth analysis of the proposed design and strongly justify and support your design |
10 |
| IP addresses table | Write the table summarising IP address, subnet-netmask, IP and address classes with appropriate justification. |
10 |
| Network Topology Diagram |
This part includes host, switches, routers, DHCP, access points server configuration guidelines and security configurations. |
10 |
| Conclusion | Write a clear and conclusive summary of the report | 05 |
| Reference Style | Follow IEEE reference style | 05 |
| TOTAL | 70 |
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 4
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
Demonstration Marks
| Section to be included in the report |
Description of the section | Marks |
| Simulation Completeness | All the elements are present requirement are met | 20 |
| Simulation execution | Simulation(s) executes satisfactorily | 05 |
| Question Answers | Student explains the design and complete process | 05 |
| Total | 30 |
Assessment/marking Description
Marks for the assignment 2 will be calculated as follows:
Individual’s Total Marks= Report Marks + Individual’s demonstration marks
Example of the marking rubric for the Assignment: Total marks 60.
The details about the rubric are as follows:
| Grades | HD 80% and above |
D 70 – 79% |
CR 60 – 69% |
P 50 – 59% |
Fail <50% |
| Introduction/05 | All the points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. |
Mostly points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide good summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. |
Many points are pertinent and covered in brief and provide summary of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. |
Few point are pertinent and covered in brief and provide outline of the literature and activity performed in the assessment. |
Many points are not pertinent and not clear and summary is not provided for the activity. |
| Project Scope/05 | All topics are pertinent and covered in depth. Ability to think critically and source material is demonstrated |
Topics relevant and soundly analysed |
Generally relevant and analysed |
Some relevance and briefly presented |
Not relevant to the assignment topic |
| Project requirements/10 |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically but did not source material appropriately |
Demonstrated an average ability to think critically and sourced reference material appropriately |
Demonstrated an average ability to think critically but did not sourced reference material appropriately |
Did not demonstrate the ability to think critically and did not sourced reference material appropriately |
| Network design/10 | All elements are present and very well integrated |
Components present with good cohesion |
Components presented and mostly well integrated |
Most components present and an average integration |
Lacks components and not integrated well |
| Design Analysis/10 | Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically |
Demonstrated excellent ability to think critically |
Demonstrated ability to think critically and |
Demonstrated ability to think critically and but |
Did not demonstrated ability to think |
MN503 Overview of Internetworking P a g e | 5
Prepared by: Dr Noor u Zaman Laghari Moderated by: Dr Saeid Iranmanesh April 2020
| and sourced reference materials appropriately |
and but did not sourced reference materials appropriately |
sourced reference materials appropriately |
did not sourced reference materials appropriately |
critically and but did not sourced reference materials appropriately |
|
| IP addresses table/10 |
All element are present, accurate description and excellent justification |
Excellent description and good justification |
Good description and good justification |
Good description and good justification |
Poor description and poor articulation |
| Network Topology/10 Diagram |
All elements are present and very well integrated |
Components present with good cohesion |
Components presented and mostly well integrated |
Most components present and an average integration |
Proposal lacks appropriate structuring and integration |
| Conclusion/05 | Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments |
Consistent logic and convincing |
Mostly consistent logic convincing |
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
Arguments are confused and disjointed |
| Reference Style/05 | Clear styles with an excellent source of references |
Clear referencing style |
Generally good referencing style |
Sometimes clear referencing style |
Lacks consistency with many errors |
| Demonstration/30 | Logic is clear and easy to follow with strong arguments and appropriate justification |
Consistent logic and convincing logic and justification |
Mostly consistent logic convincing relevant justification |
Adequate cohesion and conviction |
The argument is confused and disjointed |
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
