Professional Development Plan Rubric
[ad_1]
Professional Development Plan Rubric
Name:
Students must create a properly formatted (APA) paper that provides a summary of the their professional development plan. The required components of the paper are outlined below. Make sure that at least one opportunity for growth / development is adequately addressed.
Students will complete the assignment with attention to the criteria below.
Rating:
Exceptional corresponds to a grade of A (95). Performance is outstanding; significantly above the usual expectations.
Proficient corresponds to a grade of B (85). Skills and standards are at the level of expectation.
Basic corresponds to a grade of C (75). Skills and standards are acceptable but improvements are needed to meet expectations well.
Missing corresponds to a grade of F (0 or 60%). Performance is weak; the skills or standards are not sufficiently demonstrated at this time.
| Elements | Criteria | ||||
| Exceptional | Proficient | Basic | Missing | ||
| Plan Content | Plan must provide a clear, concise summary of the plan | Summary captures all major aspects of the plan in a succinct way. 4 – 5 Points |
Summary captures some/all major aspects of the plan in an adequate way. 4 Points | Summary captures few/some major aspects of the plan in a wordy manner. 3 Points | No summary provided Below 3 |
| Initial SWOT analysis completed | Each of the four dimensions of the SWOT is completed and SMART goals noted. 9-10 Points |
Analysis missing one required component. 8-9 Points |
Analysis missing two or more required components. 7-8 Points |
SWOT analysis not completed Below 7 |
|
| Presentation Content | Must clearly present findings and takeaways from the different assessments taken | Finding(s) of assessments are clearly presented and explained in own words reflecting own understanding of outcomes. 13-15 Points | Finding(s) of assessments are summarized and adequate. 12-13 Points | Finding(s) of assessments are identified, but not discussed enough to reflect understanding. 11-12 Points | Finding(s) of assessments not identified or explained. Below 11 |
| Must provide an updated personal SWOT based on the outcomes of the assessments, noting where it was different | Update and comparison to initial SWOT analysis is excellent and demonstrates critical thinking. 13-15 Points | Update and comparison is adequate and demonstrates some critical thinking. 12-13 Points | Update and comparison is vague and does not demonstrate critical thinking. 11-12 Points | SWOT just restated or summarized only. No comparison made. Below 11 | |
| Clearly presented at least one development opportunity | Development opportunity is clearly defined with actionable items and timelines. 13-15 Points | Development opportunity is briefly discussed but omits either actionable items or timelines 12-13 Points | Development opportunity is briefly discussed but omits both actionable items or timelines 11-12 Points | Opportunity Not Discussed Below 11 |
|
| Writing | Mechanics | Demonstrates evidence of graduate-level writing mechanics – Grammar, punctuation, paragraph structure, etc.*13-15 Points | Mechanics are adequate, but need minor improvement to be graduate level. 12-13 Points | Mechanics need significant improvements to be graduate level. 11-12 Points | Mechanics are inadequate for graduate level work. Below 11 |
| Paper Requirements | Minimum paper requirements (15 pages, topic, 10 peer-reviewed articles, research, integration of core values) are met 13-15 Points | Paper met most requirements, but fell short on one. 12-13 Points | Paper met most requirements, but fell short on two. 11-12 Points | Paper met most requirements, but fell short on more than two areas. Below 11 |
|
| Formatting Requirements | Follows formatting requirements given (e.g. APA, section headings, page numbers, title page). 9-10 Points | Formatting misses one required component. 8-9 Points |
Formatting misses two required components. 7-8 Points |
Formatting misses more than two required components. Below 7 |
[Button id=”1″]
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
