PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

[ad_1]

PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

Psychopharmacology: Case-study Assignment

 

Weight: Graded out of 40 points; worth 15% of final grade

Overview

This assignment involves applying your knowledge based on supplementary resources and some lecture material to answer questions regarding a case study. Please read through the story below and answer the subsequent questions. I hope that you find it an interesting assignment and a chance to apply some knowledge from the course so far and to learn about substances and systems that go beyond areas that we cover during class (see source info below).

Please number your responses to indicate their corresponding question. Your answers only need to be brief, but should be sufficient to both answer the question and explain your reasoning/answer. Marks will reflect the correct content of your responses as well as your ability to clearly answer the questions and demonstrate comprehension and scholarship. If you have any questions, please ask, preferentially via a post to the class D2L discussion board or during a class Zoom meeting to ensure that everyone is ‘on the same page’. More information regarding evaluation and formatting are provided at the end.

PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

Note: This case is a fictional account for the purpose of this assignment and may not represent actual scenarios. Nonetheless, it is at least partially based on real clinical case reports.

 

Source Suggestions: Lecture 2 and its related resources, as well as the following from the Stats Pearl resources useful towards better understanding the case story and answering the questions. You are welcome to use alternative/additional sources (please cite accordingly).

Evans, J., Richards, J.R., & Battisti, A. S. (2020). Caffeine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519490

 

Oelhaf, R. C., & Azadfard, M. (2020). Heroin Toxicity. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK430736/

 

‘Horton and the Sisters Three ’

In the meantime, Cindy-Lou had received her next injection and was now awake and alert. As the sisters reunited, Yertle started to recall some things from earlier on in his psychopharmacology class…something about some form of tolerance and salivating dogs…but these weren’t quite the same things… “Aha!” exclaimed Yertle as he turned to share his understanding of the events with the three sisters.

Answer the following questions and see if you can help Yertle complete this story!

 

Questions

 

  1. Do you think the sisters’ story and Cindy-Lou’s symptoms are more consistent with heroin or caffeine toxicity? Explain your rationale using at least 3 pieces of evidence/ examples from the case story. (5 pts)

 

  1. What types of receptors are most implicated in the effects of heroin and caffeine? How do these drugs act on these receptors (i.e., agonist, partial agonist, antagonist)? (4 pts)

 

  1. What drug (or kind) would have relieved such serious symptoms in Cindy-Lou so quickly? Explain whether/how this fits with details in the story. (3 pts)

 

  1. What form of tolerance was Yertle likely remembering? Consider how this form of tolerance might be relevant in this particular That is, finish the story with how you think Yertle might explain to the sisters that Cindy- Lou did in fact overdose, when neither Mayzie nor Sally did, despite their similar drug-use history and their same use of the drug that night. That is, role-play to explain as if you are Yertle in context of the case and provide supporting examples from the story. (5 pts)

 

  1. Why do you think Yertle suspects the energy drinks were the root of Horton’s condition? Similar to Q4, explain your rationale as if you are Yertle to help complete this aspect of the story. Incorporate at least 3 pieces of evidence/ examples from the case story to support your explanation. (5 pts)

 

  1. Beyond the information discussed in your responses to Qs1-5, what else did you learn related to psychopharmacology in your research for this assignment that you found of interest? Explain one aspect that you learned and why you found it of interest. (3 pts)

PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

Continued

 

Evaluation

30 pts for Qs1-6

10 pts for overall scholarship*

/40 pts Total

 

Late penalty: -1 pt/day up until the end of classes (Dec 7), after which a mark of 0 will apply

 

*Scholarship will be evaluated on a number of dimensions across the full assignment. Below is a rubric presented as a general (not necessarily comprehensive) guide regarding example grading considerations that will be taken into consideration:

 

≤ 5 7 10
Poorly organized answers; struggles to convey

points; does not adequately reflect course

material relevant to the question

Meets expectations with satisfactory organization of answer; adequately conveys points; includes discussion of course material relevant to the question; limited evidence of depth of understanding Truly outstanding organization of answer; very effectively conveys points; includes comprehensive discussion of course material relevant to the question; provides ample evidence of superb depth of understanding

PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study

Formatting

 

Please number your responses to indicate their corresponding question. Your responses should be double-spaced with 11- or 12-point font. There is no page restriction, but we expect you’ll need 2-4 pages. Content and clarity is more important than length. Although you only need to submit an electronic copy via the Turnitin submission link in our course D2L page, please clearly indicate your name and ID on the assignment as a back-up. It is expected that you will just need the suggested resources and lecture materials for this assignment, but you may use additional resources. If you cite relevant sources, please use APA citation/referencing style.

You can cite lecture slides in the text as, for example, “(Girard Lecture 2, 2020)” and in the references as “Girard,

  1. A. (2020). Lecture 2: Principles of psychopharmacology [PowerPoint]. Toronto, ON.” Acknowledge your sources when you present evidence or ideas that are not your own.
    Need Help with this Assignment?

     

The post PSY214 Assignment 2 Case study appeared first on homeworkcrew.com.

[ad_2]

Source link

"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."

Essay Writing Service
Affordable prices

You might be focused on looking for a cheap essay writing service instead of searching for the perfect combination of quality and affordable rates. You need to be aware that a cheap essay does not mean a good essay, as qualified authors estimate their knowledge realistically. At the same time, it is all about balance. We are proud to offer rates among the best on the market and believe every student must have access to effective writing assistance for a cost that he or she finds affordable.

Caring support 24/7

If you need a cheap paper writing service, note that we combine affordable rates with excellent customer support. Our experienced support managers professionally resolve issues that might appear during your collaboration with our service. Apply to them with questions about orders, rates, payments, and more. Contact our managers via our website or email.

Non-plagiarized papers

“Please, write my paper, making it 100% unique.” We understand how vital it is for students to be sure their paper is original and written from scratch. To us, the reputation of a reliable service that offers non-plagiarized texts is vital. We stop collaborating with authors who get caught in plagiarism to avoid confusion. Besides, our customers’ satisfaction rate says it all.

© 2022 Homeworkcrew.com provides writing and research services for limited use only. All the materials from our website should be used with proper references and in accordance with Terms & Conditions.

Scroll to Top