Reasons Why A Prosecutor Would Offer A Defendant A Plea Agreement
[ad_1]
Answer the following questions with a 250 word response(There is no required word count to meet for this class so this is just a general request). Please use at least 1 scholarly reference in each response to each question.
Question 1 Part 1:
There are various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. There are also two different types of evidence used, physical evidence and circumstantial evidence.
This forum examines the reliability of the various methods used and examines the two different types of evidence.
Please thoroughly discuss each of the following:
1. Discuss the various identification methods used in the criminal justice system. Discuss some of the flaws with eye witness identifications?
2. What is the difference between physical evidence and circumstantial evidence? Which do you believe is more reliable to a jury? Discuss why.
3. What are some of the benefits and drawbacks to relying on DNA evidence in a criminal case?
Question 2:
There are various factors in making decisions to charge an individual with a crime. There are also stages and rules of trial by jury and rules of entering a guilty plea.
This forum asks you to examine plea agreements and the trial process.
Please thoroughly discuss each of the following:
1. Discuss some of the reasons why a prosecutor would offer a defendant a plea agreement. Discuss your thoughts on plea bargaining. Discuss the constitutional requirements of entering a guilty plea.
2. What is the difference between a bench trial and a jury trial. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
3. Do you think the prosecutor is given too much discretion to determine the charges placed on a defendant? Do you think the prosecutor is given too much discretion to offer a defendant a plea agreement? Discuss why and remember to support your position.
Question 3:
After a defendant is found guilty there is the sentencing and appeal phase of the process. Most attorneys will file an appeal on behalf of the defendant if there is an appealable issue. Sometimes the judge is granted a lot of discussion in determining a defendant’s sentence. Other times, the judge’s hands are tied based on the mandatory minimum sentencing laws.
This forum asks you to examine the sentencing and appeal phase of the criminal process.
Please thoroughly discuss each of the following:
1. Are judges given too much discretion when it comes to sentencing? What are some of the factors a judge looks at when determining an appropriate sentence? Do you believe the time fit the crime or should the time fit the offender? Discuss some of the different types of a sentence a judge may order.
2. What is the difference between a determinate and indeterminate sentence? Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
3. Do you think mandatory minimum sentences serve any real purpose? Do these types of sentences deter offenders?
Order with us today for a quality custom paper on the above topic or any other topic!
What Awaits you:
• High Quality custom-written papers
• Automatic plagiarism check
• On-time delivery guarantee
• Masters and PhD-level writers
• 100% Privacy and Confidentiality
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
