Why Doctors Have A Moral Obligation To “Intervene” In Patient Decision Making
[ad_1]
- Topic
Paternalism: Explain Terrence Ackerman’s argument that doctors ought to intervene in patient decision making in order to protect and respect patient autonomy. Do doctors have a moral obligation to “intervene” in patient decision making? Explain why or why not.
[It may be worth thinking about cases like the SCC case of Starson v. Swayze or the case of Malette v. Shulman to answer this question]
- Assignment Description:
This is an argumentative philosophy paper. This means that you will be arguing for a conclusion, also known as a thesis or a view. You should provide an extremely brief introduction with a clearly stated thesis statement. Your thesis should answer the question posed in the topic you’ve chosen, or it should answer a question that is a subset of that question.
You may use the following thesis format by filling in the blanks to create your thesis statement:
“I will argue that [insert philosopher’s last name here]’s view that [insert philosopher’s position here] is [correct/incorrect/unsupported/supported by their reasons/ought to be modified/etc.] because [insert your reason here]“.
III. Requirements & Structure
Your paper should accomplish the following things:
(1) Reconstruct the important parts of the argument from the target article.
(2) Present an argument based on that author’s view (this argument may take the form of an objection to their view, a critical expansion on their view, a major clarification to the author’s view, or etc.).
(3) Evaluate the status of the philosopher’s target article, now that you’ve argued for a position. What is the result of your argument?
Your introduction should be extremely brief, no more than 4 sentences long. You do not need a concluding paragraph or “conclusion”. You may provide a brief “summing up” sentence in conclusion if you wish to.
Papers that are excessively over or under the requested length will be penalized. Please make sure that your paper is between 900-1050 words long.
- Evaluation
Your paper will be evaluated for its reconstruction and explanation of the important and relevant points of the philosopher’s argument, for its provision of a detailed and interesting argument, and for the paper’s writing quality, including grammar, spelling, structure, and style.
- Citations & List of Works Cited
Quotations and paraphrases should be accompanied by a citation (typically in-text) which will typically include a page number. If you are unfamiliar with how to in-text cite, please use the following format to cite texts (author’s last name, page #), for example: (R. Dworkin, 34). For online sources that do not have pages, you do not need to cite a page number.
At the end of your paper please provide a List of Works Cited, with as much bibliographic information for your cited texts as is available.
Here is a sample List of Works Cited:
List of Works Cited:
Dworkin, Gerald. (2010). “Autonomy & Informed Consent.” Ch. 7 of The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, pp. 100- 120. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kukla, Quill R. (2005). “Conscientious Autonomy: Displacing Decisions in Health Care.” The Hastings Centre Report 35(2): 34-44.
Place your order now for a similar paper and have exceptional work written by our team of experts to guarantee you A Results
Why Choose US:
11+ years experience on custom writing
90% Return Client
Urgent 3 Hrs Delivery
Your Privacy Guaranteed
Unlimited Free Revisions
Money Back Guarantee
The post Why Doctors Have A Moral Obligation To “Intervene” In Patient Decision Making first appeared on homeworkcrew.
[ad_2]
Source link
"96% of our customers have reported a 90% and above score. You might want to place an order with us."
